Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit CaptainObviousSays's column >>

CAPTAINOBVIOUSSAYS

Just Relax, ok? I do not want a nickel. a pickle or a tickle - I just wanna ride my motorcycle
Articles Posted: 20  Links Seeded: 24
Member Since: 9/2010  Last Seen: 5/18/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

The U.S. Department OF Health and Human Services - Healthcare Proposal?

Sun Jan 9, 2011 10:25 PM EST
politics, health-care, healthcare, constitutional
By CaptainObviousSays
Advertise | AdChoices

The Department OF health and Human Services
Tasked with overseeing the collection of, and the distribution of funds for the peoples healthcare
- Proposal by Captain Obvious -

With Regrets???
We the people need to send our regrets to the health insurance industry...
- as we no longer need their service.

How it Works

Everyone who works pays the appropriate percentage of their income

Examples
high income pays higher percentages
example: 15%
lower income pays a lower percentage
example: 3%.
- enforced by IRS -
no additional IRS employees required
we are sure the computers can handle that bit.
Health Care will be provided to all -
at no further cost to the taxpayer
States will cover any financial shortfalls.
funded by the states current healthcare revenue streams
[This will be less of a burden than states are paying now]

The tax revenue will be collected by the federal government
and divided amongst the states based on population
each person will receive the same level of care
- including all elected representatives -

Above you will find what we do - Below is what we do not do.

In creating The New U.S. Department OF Health and Human Services, Congress specifies that:

No provision of a program administered by the Secretary or by any other officer of the Department shall be construed to authorize the Secretary or any such officer to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the administration, or personnel of any healthcare institution, hospital, or healthcare system, over any accrediting agency or association, or over the the direction of medical care provided
These are responsibilities to be handled by the various states and districts as well as by public and private organizations of all kinds, not by the The U.S. Department OF Health and Human Services.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • CaptainObviousSays's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (37)
CaptainObviousSays

Repeal and Replace

or maybe you enjoy being enslaved to the health insurance companies for life?

Cheers
:)

  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jan 9, 2011 10:24 PM EST
CaptainObviousSays

This proposal does not grow government.
Will lower the cost for the average individual.
And as a bonus - it is constitutional.

the only thing wrong with it is...

there is no federal power grab
no unconstitutional mandates on the people
no unfunded mandates on the states
the health insurance companies go out of business
I can live with this - can you?

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:16 AM EST
Stone5150

Sounds good to me.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:28 AM EST
Reply
SeniorTokarev

They aint ever gonna get me Captain Obvious.Its too late.The damned car insurance companies already have me!

  • 4 votes
#2 - Sun Jan 9, 2011 10:36 PM EST
CaptainObviousSays

LOL

I wish I could understand why the left wants to make sure the heath insurance companies continue to exist by guaranteeing them customers / slaves for life.

I say - send the health insurance companies the way of the blacksmith.

Remove their profits and BS from our health care equations.

  • 11 votes
#2.1 - Sun Jan 9, 2011 10:40 PM EST
MDC-441879

I say - send the health insurance companies the way of the blacksmith.

Well, I'll be darned. We agree on something there.

About the left wanting to keep the Ins. Cos. was not an idea of the left. Every move to take business from them was blocked by the right. Remember the public option? The right blocked it. Sen. Bernie Sanders tried to introduce it and a republican sen.(can't remember his name) wanted it read on the floor of the house and then left the building. Ergo, reason to change the rules of the filibuster. It would have taken three days to read the intire thing. Thus it was dropped. There was a proposal to start medicare at an earlier age but that had a filibuster thrown on it too. Every attempt to do what you propose in your article was stopped by the right.

Remove their profits and BS from our health care equations.

I do agree here completely.

  • 5 votes
#2.2 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:10 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

About the left wanting to keep the Ins. Cos. was not an idea of the left

then they should not have passed what they did pass...
or
Obama should have sent it back unsigned.

period.

  • 5 votes
#2.3 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:23 AM EST
MDC-441879

then they should not have passed what they did pass...

Then nothing would have passed and the right with the help of the insurance lobby would have made sure that the idea was never brought up again. Something had to get done and they at least half-assed did it. I'm not completely happy with it but it is a start that can maybe be improved on.

Still, I agree with your premiss.

  • 3 votes
#2.4 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:43 AM EST
MDC-441879

I would also like to add that your idea is a for left socialist program.

  • 4 votes
#2.5 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:46 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

but it is a start that can maybe be mproved on.

I can not agree

the federal mandate on the people to buy insurance is unconstitutional
and as such that law needs to die a swift death

if that death brings about constitutional change maybe then it would be worth the aggravation and discontent the current law has caused then more power to the GOP in repealing ObamaCare

Still, I agree with your premiss.

thanks - I tried to frame it so most people, left or right, would feel that way
- everyone wins except the health insurance industry -

  • 4 votes
#2.6 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:48 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

I would also like to add that your idea is a for left socialist program.

in my proposal you will notice:

the feds have no control over our actual health care
but can only round up some funds for it...

I would call it social service - not socialism
there is a difference between the two yanno...

  • 4 votes
#2.7 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:51 AM EST
MDC-441879

If the feds round up the funding through taxation, isn't that the same as a mandate to purchase ins.? Even if you don't want it? The whole reason for the mandate is that some people wait until they need ins. before they buy it. Then it's too late and the rest of us get stuck with the cost through higher health care costs and premiums to the ins. co.

Any time you put the word "social" on it you've got socialism and that brings out the crazy accusations.

I have to admit, I like the decent debate we're having about this.

  • 3 votes
#2.8 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:02 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

If the feds round up the funding through taxation, isn't that the same as a mandate to purchase ins.?

no

a mandate to buy a product from another individual is not the same thing as paying taxes directly to the feds

everything is not the same as everything else.

Any time you put the word "social" on it you've got socialism

only to a liberal
any one with a dictionary knows this is not true

social services is NOT the same as socialism

  • 4 votes
#2.9 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:08 AM EST
MDC-441879

Now why can't congress have this type of debate?

I'm going to bed now. I'm hitting the "back space" to much. I'm tired.

  • 2 votes
#2.10 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:13 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

I'm going to bed now. I'm hitting the "back space" to much. I'm tired.

cheers my friend
I am about to do the same

:)

  • 3 votes
#2.11 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:14 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

Now why can't congress have this type of debate?

maybe they sold us out to big business / health insurance companies???

call or email your representatives...
and demand they get their heads out of the health insurance companies asses

cheers
:)

  • 3 votes
#2.12 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:33 AM EST
Fla Pat

I would call it social service - not socialism
there is a difference between the two yanno...

I see, if the republicans do it, it is social service. If it comes from the dems, it's socialism.

I actually said below I kind of liked your idea and it might have merit; I would not like you to think I had a total conversion however!

Cheers :)

  • 2 votes
#2.13 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:33 PM EST
CaptainObviousSays

I see, if the republicans do it, it is social service. If it comes from the dems, it's socialism.

your operating off assumptions that have no basis in fact concerning me

I have never said or even implied such a thing

maybe you also assume I am republican?
I am conservative but also independent.
if I had my way I would scrap the republican party as well as the democrat party
and only allow independents to run
- I have no use for party thought or agendas.

my advice to you is stick only to what you know for sure...
as assumptions tend to make you look foolish.

cheers
:)

  • 3 votes
#2.14 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:35 PM EST
Fla Pat

your operating off assumptions that have no basis in fact concerning me

I have never said or even implied such a thing

Man, I must have been way off base.

I would call it social service - not socialism

Lets see, the words above are yours, they are in regard to your proposal which, if the same proposal would have come from a liberal it would have been labeled socialism, but from a conservative it is merely a social service.

I don't see how I could have misunderstood. GOP Plan?

my advice to you is stick only to what you know for sure...
as assumptions tend to make you look foolish.

No more so than you trying to spin a position that many of your fellow conservatives would denounce at the drop of a hat as anti-capitalist and a socialist government take-over of health care... or some such nonsense.

And by the way I still like the idea of the proposal.

  • 2 votes
#2.15 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:39 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

No more so than you trying to spin a position that many of your fellow conservatives would denounce at the drop of a hat as anti-capitalist and a socialist government take-over of health care... or some such nonsense.

to be fair...
you might get that response from the fools in washington
and even some right extremists on this site

but speaking as an independent..
I can assure you that all of my independent friends,
who are conservatives as well...
would not agree with your analysis.

by the way
independents outnumber dems and repubs combined
so party is not really the issue.

  • 2 votes
#2.16 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:48 AM EST
Fla Pat

so party is not really the issue.

Then why did you use it in the title? I'm curious.

  • 1 vote
#2.17 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:58 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

Then why did you use it in the title? I'm curious.

didja see the question mark following that party???

I can have dreams to yanno???

as the republicans control the house - they currently hold the keys to the car.

at the moment any idea from the dems will never get heard by the house.

the oldest trick in the book is to get/let your opposition think your idea
was their idea. so they can not wait to get it done.

when I have decide to end a relationship...
I always encourage "her" to think it was her idea -
or she will try to come back and work it out.

when she thinks it was her idea to split up -
she leaves very fast and...
she is never heard from again
which is my desired result.

cheers
:)

  • 2 votes
#2.18 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:17 AM EST
Fla Pat

Got it, thanks.

when I have decide to end a relationship...
I always encourage "her" to think it was her idea -
or she will try to come back and work it out.

I don't think that is out of Dr Phil's playbook, but whatever! And now good evening to you good sir.

  • 1 vote
#2.19 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:30 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

I don't think that is out of Dr Phil's playbook,

it works like a charm

by the way
who is DR Phil?

  • 2 votes
#2.20 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:37 AM EST
Reply
Fla Pat

I would love to see this. By the way we already have a Dept of Health and Human Services.

I am afraid that there is to much vested interest for the health insurance industry to go away however. As MDC stated above, look what happened to the public option.

Above you will find what we do - Below is what we do not do.

And how is this to be determined? The debate would be interesting to say the least.

You know, often the best solution is the simplest one. This could be a good start.

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:23 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

we already have a Dept of Health and Human Services

Ha, I knew I heard of that somewhere.. LOL
great no need to create a new body - just add a new task

And how is this to be determined? The debate would be interesting to say the least.

my proposal is a grand place to start
and is constitutional.

  • 5 votes
#3.1 - Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:26 AM EST
Reply
jfxgillis

Cap'n Ob:

I only needed to read the first sentence to realize my suspicion on the other thread was correct:

We the people need to send our regrets to the health insurance industry...
- as we no longer need their service.

A. That will NEVER happen;

B. To label it a "GOP proposal" is beyond ridiculous.

All you've done is repeat the single-payer system proposed by the ten of fifteen percent most left-wing Democrats in Congress. There's literally not a single GOP Member of either House of Congress that would even consider your plan ... beyond calling it a Communist Socialist French Muslim betrayal of Paul Revere.

  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:07 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

There's literally not a single GOP Member of either House of Congress that would even consider your plan ...

yeah and that is the rub ey?
to bad we have idiots on both sides of the isles

To label it a "GOP proposal" is beyond ridiculous

one can hope yanno.

beyond calling it a Communist Socialist French Muslim betrayal of Paul Revere.

actually it is a direct model of the dept of educations charter
so unless they contend the dept of education unconstitutional
they would be talking out of their backsides and everyone would know it.

A. That will NEVER happen;

how do you know that? given up so easy?
everyone, from both sides, and independents, need to get on congress's ass and tell them to do it.

this is not a "party issue"
it is a people issue.

do you have the nads to work with us?
or simply prefer to work against?

your choice.
:)

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:20 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

I would love to see a 100 million person march on Washington demanding this

if 1/3 of the country, people from both sides, and the middle,
showed up demanding this idea become law how could they ignore us?

the problem is getting everyone to work together and stop the petty bickering.

at the moment - we the people still own this country
we should remind them of that ASAP
before we lose our country.

  • 2 votes
#4.2 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:38 AM EST
jfxgillis

Cap'N Ob:

how do you know that? given up so easy?

Since you seem to have a taste for the obvious, as a Democrat let me remind you that we spent SIXTY @!$%#ING YEARS trying to get this job HALF DONE and some worthless pipedream like your "plan" is no help at all.

We've @!$%#ing been there and @!$%#ing done that for, again, SIXTY @!$%#ING YEARS.

this is not a "party issue"

Bull@!$%#. Your side made it a party issue when you were convinced you could inflict a "waterloo" on the Democrats with it like you did in 1994. So then we achieve our goal against all expectations, then pay a massive political price for it, and now you dare, you DARE whine about "working together"?

You had your chance to "work together" between November 2008 and November 2010 and you @!$%#ed it up because you thought inflicting damage on Obama and Pelosi was more important than health care reform. Well, you did inflict damage and we did get reform done.

Now, about this part.

do you have the nads to work with us?

Go browse my comment page for the last couple of months and you'll see multiple points where I said I support Scott Brown & Ron Wyden's proposed reform-of-the-reform which allows states to dispense with the individual mandate provided they reach the established benchmarks in terms of coverage.

It will absolutely KILL Me to do so, but if Brown gets this bill signed into law I'll probably vote for him in 2012. The first Republican for whom I would have voted for United States Senate since Ed Brooke in 1972.

  • 5 votes
#4.3 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:47 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

which allows states to dispense with the individual mandate provided they reach the established benchmarks in terms of coverage.

can I operate on the notion that the proposal you describe says they will drop the federal mandate if states enact mandates of their own?

or are states free to be creative and come up with their own solutions?

  • 2 votes
#4.4 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:56 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

Bull@!$%#. Your side made it a party issue

I already explained I am not republican

Since you seem to have a taste for the obvious, as a Democrat let me remind you that we spent SIXTY @!$%#ING YEARS trying to get this job HALF DONE and some worthless pipedream like your "plan" is no help at all.

We've @!$%#ing been there and @!$%#ing done that for, again, SIXTY @!$%#ING YEARS.

your a little wound up - is a civil discussion out of the realm of possibility with you?

again -

political party is not the issue
political party is the problem
both sides are to blame

while the mjority, who are independents, are forced to sit ringside

  • 2 votes
#4.5 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:05 AM EST
jfxgillis

Cap'N Ob:

can I operate on the notion that the proposal you describe says they will drop the federal mandate if states enact mandates of their own?

That is not my understanding. The individual mandate in the Federal law has a benchmark of improving coverage from 80% of the public to 94 or 95%. Any state that produces any plan that meets that benchmark, including Vermont which is considering the very plan you outlined above, would be entitled to use that plan.

I already explained I am not republican

Then let's just say you're of the anti-Democratic party. You don't care who wins as long as those dirty @!$%#ing hippies lose. Got it.

you're a little wound up - is a civil discussion out of the realm of possibility with you?

Yes I am, but there's nothing particularly uncivil about my comments.

  • 3 votes
#4.6 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:27 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

Then let's just say you're of the anti-Democratic party. You don't care who wins as long as those dirty @!$%#ing hippies lose. Got it.

I have said before and will say it again

I only seem republican when dems have control
and
I only seem democrat when republicans have control

if you think I gave bush any less hell than I give Obama
- your seriously mistaken -

depending on issues I can be found on either side of the fence
I despise both parties but have no choice but to deal with them.

Independent

GOT IT YET?

ciao
:)

  • 3 votes
#4.7 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:44 AM EST
BIGTIMEj

then they should not have passed what they did pass...
or
Obama should have sent it back unsigned.

period.

you do realize obama was elected on the promise of reforming healthcare, it is what the voters wanted.

  • 1 vote
#4.8 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:14 AM EST
CaptainObviousSays

you do realize obama was elected on the promise of reforming healthcare, it is what the voters wanted.

agreed...
people wanted healthcare reform
but they did not want ObamaCare
He should have done a better job instead of caving in to the insurance companies
- makes him damn weak I think.

the shouts of NO before they passed that bill where deafening
for a guy with such big ears - Obama seemed to not hear a thing
now the dems are paying for that......

that is why round 50% want it repealed now - because they loved it so much then???

1 in 4 dems want it repealed in favor of single payer
I kinda like that single payer version myself

this law needs to die by the hands of SCOTUS
screw the damn politicians

if obamacare is the best they can do
I want none of it - it is unconstitutional.
I will never comply.

remember what you said when it goes up for repeal = because that is why we put the GOP in charge of the house

seems we can not trust the dems with the keys to the car or the house = funny huh?

  • 1 vote
#4.9 - Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:06 AM EST
Reply
Loyal Demokrat

We're not talking "lock box" here are we?

    Reply#5 - Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:03 AM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com